Virginia Accident Lawyer

1. Liability - Many Virginia auto accident cases involve a dispute over who is at fault. In a simple rear end collision, liability is often accepted when the claim is filed. If the accident involves a lane change, sudden stop, multiple impacts or two different accounts of the accident with no police report or witness, the automobile insurance company often denies liability(almost always if the carrier is Geico or MAIF). These claims end up in court where an experienced personal injury attorney has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the other driver was at fault. The term preponderance of the evidence means more likely than not. In other words, the fate of your accident recovery often depends on the experience of the trial lawyer you retained. A "Trial Lawyer" is someone you need to hire when you first call an attorney, not just a Virginia accident lawyer. Portner & Shure's attorneys are trial attorneys and our website reflects many of the injury awards we have received in court, not just by settling.
2. Contributory Negligence - Virginia's contributory negligence doctrine is cut throat and can be a complete bar to an injured victim's recovery. Virginia personal injury attorneys often struggle to help clients because of this all or nothing rule. Under contributory negligence, the accident victim's failure to exercise a reasonable degree of care and caution, no matter how slight, is an absolute bar to recovery. If the defendant's lawyer can convince a jury that the victim was only 1% at fault, that individual will not recover any damages. 
3. Low Property Damage - Some Virginia automobile accident claims, where liability is not disputed, don't settle. One of the main reasons these cases fail to settle is because insurance adjusters refuse to offer fair settlements in accidents where the property damage to the injured victim's vehicle amounts to less than $1,000. Insurance companies often argue, in these cases, that the medical treatment received by the injured party was not warranted considering the low impact and that the injuries suffered could not have resulted from a minor accident. The adjusters' low impact argument often fails in court. There are several arguments that can be made on behalf of a plaintiff by an experienced Virginia accident lawyer. First, large accidents with significant property damage can result in little or no injuries to those involved, while minor accidents often result in serious injuries. Second, especially in rear end collisions, the injured victim does not have a chance to brace for impact. Third, sometimes the types of vehicles involved can explain the extent of the property damage. Forth, the evaluation of the accident victim's injuries and treatment is done by medical professionals who, absent evidence to the contrary, give medical treatment that is fair and reasonable and medically necessary. In almost every district court in Virginia, Portner & Shure trial attorneys have prevailed in low impact accidents.
4. Preexisting Injury or Underlying Condition - In many Virginia personal injury cases, the injured victim may have a preexisting injury or underlying condition. In these personal injury cases, insurance companies' attorneys will argue that the individual was already injured, experiencing symptoms before the accident and that the injury was not caused by the accident. When a plaintiff has a preexisting injury, an experienced Virginia accident attorney can use medical records to show that the plaintiff was fully recovered from the accident and released from treatment. Further, the personal injury attorney can argue that the plaintiff was asymptomatic before the current accident or that the preexisting injury was made worse by the accident. If the injured accident victim has a preexisting injury, such as a degenerative back condition, the fact that the condition was exacerbated or that there was a predisposition for an injury could explain why the accident resulted in significant injury. This argument is based off of the "Egg Shell Theory" which dictates that the condition of the victim prior to the accident does not mitigate the liability of the negligent party for the injuries resulting from the accident. In other words, "you take the victim as you find them".
5. (a) Causally Related - Sometimes insurance companies and there lawyers will argue that the injuries are not causally related to the accident, and that there is no reasonable connection between the accident and the alleged injuries. For example, if an individual is involved in an automobile accident and claims that, as a result, he or she had an appendix removed there is a strong argument against that claim. However, if a person is involved in an accident, which leads to a panic attack and an overnight stay in a hospital, there is a strong argument to be made that the condition was caused or exacerbated because of another person's negligence. Again, the Virginia personal injury attorneys have to prove by, a preponderance of the evidence, that the injury was caused by the accident, which means that the injury was more likely than not caused by the accident.
(b) Medically Necessary - This defense is often used when an injury victim pursues alternative healthcare such as acupuncture, acupressure and aquatic therapy. Insurance companies and there attorneys argue that this treatment is not legitimate. At trial, defense attorneys will often make a pretrial objection to any type of acupuncture treatment. The Virginia attorneys at Portner & Shure represent many Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese accident victims. Our Virginia accident attorneys defeat the objections of defense attorneys. Acupuncture is an ancient form of medicine and to argue that an injury victim does not have an option to be treated by an acupuncturists is rarely successful at trial. In Virginia accident cases that involve more serious injuries, defense attorneys often argue that invasive procedures such as surgery and epidural steroid injections are not medically necessary. This argument is easily overcome by the expert testimony of a treating physician.
6. Assumption of the Risk - The concept of "assumption of the risk" is fairly basic. For example, bee keepers assume the risk of being stung and rock climbers assume the risk of falling to their death. Simply put, a person who engages in risky activities cannot complain when the result is injury or death. The legal concept of "assumption of the risk" is based on the same principle, but does require a more detailed explanation. In Virginia, a person assumes the risk if that individual voluntarily engages a particular action or inaction known to that person to be inherently dangerous. If that particular action or inaction leads to an accident which results in injury, there can be no claim of negligence. For example, if a person is having a particularly good time and decides to dance on top of the bar, that individual cannot claim negligence if he or she slips on a spilled drink and falls. Assumption of the risk is a favorite argument of defense lawyers in Virginia, however, it is seldom applicable in auto accident, malpractice and product liability cases. The assumption of the risk defense is often utilized successfully in Virginia slip and fall cases.
7. Subsequent Accident or Injury - If an accident victim is involved in a subsequent accident the insurance companies and their attorneys can argue that the subsequent accident superceded the prior accident. An experienced Virginia personal injury lawyer can overcome this defense by examining the medical records. If the plaintiff's complaints were resolved before the subsequent accident then the defense is without merit. In cases where the subsequent accident was minor and there was little to no treatment, the personal injury attorney can argue that the subsequent accident was merely a blip on the radar and did not impact the more serious injuries resulting from the prior accident.
8. Gaps in Treatment - Too often Virginia accident victims wait several days before they are seen by a doctor, physical therapist or chiropractor. The longer the gap between the accident and the initial medical evaluation and treatment the stronger the argument that the accident victim did not require treatment. Defense attorneys like to argue that because an accident victim didn't immediately go to the hospital or doctor that the plaintiff's complaints lose credibility. Experienced Virginia personal injury attorneys should know that, in many cases, symptoms such as pain and stiffness do not manifest until a few days after the accident. Once an initial evaluation is done, gaps between treatment can be damaging to a personal injury claim. Most treatment plans follow a schedule prescribed by a medical professional designed to reach optimal recovery. Deviation from the treatment plan should be avoided. A defense attorney, who is presented with gaps ranging from a week to a month between treatment dates, has a very strong argument against the plaintiff's claims.
9. Fair and Reasonable - This is a term based off of community standards. This argument is often used when an injury victim double treats with two chiropractors and neither of the chiropractors knows. Defense attorneys will argue that an injury victim over treated and that the length of treatment was too long. In some cases, an injury victim may get MRI's of parts of the body that weren't injured in the accident. Sometimes healthcare providers over charge or over treat. When this unfair practice occurs the healthcare provider actually comes under attack and those bills may be nullified by the court's determination. The basic rule to follow in order to avoid this defense is to treat until your injuries are resolved.
10. Poor Witness - The insurance company will often contend the accident case is worthless because the plaintiff does not present well, or is a poor witness. In these instances the carrier must be pressed to give the exact reason for this contention. Often adequate trial preparation can overcome this issue. Further, the issue may be raised due to prejudice or language barriers. Some adjusters hear a foreign accent, whether Spanish, Chinese, Korean or Vietnamese, and immediately offer less. At Portner & Shure we have experience in Virginia courts litigating cases including Spanish, Korean, Chinese and Vietnamese speaking accident victims. Our Verdicts have never suffered because one of our plaintiffs is non-English speaking.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced a final rule that employs the latest research in driver fatigue to make sure Maryland and Virginia truck drivers can get the rest they need to operate safely when on the road. The new rule by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) revises the hours-of-service (HOS) safety requirements for commercial truck drivers.

"Trucking is a difficult job, and a big rig can be deadly when a driver is tired and overworked," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "This final rule will help prevent fatigue-related truck crashes and save lives. Truck drivers deserve a work environment that allows them to perform their jobs safely."

As part of the HOS rulemaking process, FMCSA held six public listening sessions across the country and encouraged safety advocates, drivers, truck company owners, law enforcement and the public to share their input on HOS requirements. The listening sessions were live webcast on the FMCSA Web site, allowing a broad cross-section of individuals to participate in the development of this safety-critical rule.

Hiring the best Maryland or Virginia automobile accident attorney does not mean you no longer have any responsibility for your accident claim. In fact, at Portner & Shure we ask all of our Howard County accident clients to do these ten things in each claim. In our experience, the client who works closely with our office helps ensure a good medical result and greater recovery. Below is a list of what you should expect to be your responsibilities:

1. During the first two days after your Maryland or Virginia automobile accident if you are hurt you must seek medical attention. All insurance companies value claims based on what the medical documentation reveals. An indication that a person was truly hurt in a Maryland or Virginia automobile accident comes from medical documentation close in time to the accident.

Hundreds of lives could be saved in both Maryland, D.C., and Virginia, over the next five years if the legislature passed more phased-in driving privileges for teens. Across the nation, and in the Maryland and Virginia area, motor-vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for teens. In fact, per each mile driven, drivers ages 16-19 are four times more likely to be involved in an automobile accident.

Thousands of Portner & Shure's personal injury and criminal clients, in both Maryland and Virginia, log onto social media sites every day to chronicle their personal and professional lives. These sites create a virtual gold mine of potential legal liability and discoverable information that may have a devastating impact on the outcome of both a Maryland or Virginia accident, or criminal case. One of the first lawsuits to be filed over social medica activity involved country singer, Courtney Love, who was sued by her former designer for defamation concerning alleged damaging statements posted by Love on her Twitter account. Love's supposed damaging tweets were "published" to her 40,000 Twitter followers, and set the stage for the world's first well-known social media suit.

U.S. Transportation Secretary announced a rule specifically prohibiting interstate truck and bus drivers from using hand-held cell phones while operating their vehicle. This new rule is certainly news to me. I would have thought that this rule was in affect for some time. The joint rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is the latest effort by the U.S. Department of Transportation to end distracted driving. Personally, the fact that the rule was not in affect until now is alarming. When drivers of large trucks, buses and hazardous materials take their eyes off the road for even a few seconds the consequences can be deadly. This rule will save lives by helping truckers stay focused on safety at all times.

Small, low-fare curbside bus companies are involved in fatal crashes seven times as often as those run by traditional companies such as Greyhound and Peter Pan according to a federal study. The smaller companies often pick up their customers by the curb, saving the cost of maintaining a presence in bus terminals. The same study, conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board, also showed that the federal agency in charge of oversight of buses is overwhelmed and understaffed, averaging one staff member for every 1000 companies. The report was done in the wake of a March 12^th bus crash in New York that killed fifteen and injured eighteen

The Virginia State Highway Safety office has complied some interesting accident statistics. They include:

• (rush hours, no surprise) There were nearly 7,000 car accidents that happened in the 4:00 p.m. to 5:59 p.m. time period

• Most fatal car accidents happened after rush hour and it was dark, between 9:00 p.m. and 9:59 p.m.

• The highest percentage of injury crashes took place between 5:00 p.m. and 5:59 p.m.

• Safest time and lowest number of injury collisions occurred between 4:00 p.m. and 4:59 p.m..

Most fatal accidents occur after rush hour when it gets dark, while the most accidents occur during rush hour. In the Virginia area, therefore, if you can avoid driving, or reduce your driving at rush hour times, statistically you reduce your chances of being in an accident.

When an automobile accident, truck accident or doctor's negligence results in a fatality there are two separate claims that can be made on behalf of the victim's family and estate. A Virginia wrongful death attorney can bring a wrongful death action. This type of claim is brought by the immediate relatives of the victim. In a wrongful death claim the family seeks to recover for their losses resulting from the accidental death of a loved one. A Virginia personal injury lawyer can bring what is called a survival action on behalf of the victim's estate. A survival action claims damages for the injuries suffered by the decedent including the pain and suffering and other damages and actual expenses incurred by the victim up until the time of death. In Virginia, one must choose between a survival action and a wrongful death action. Virginia does not allow both claims to be pursued.

Virginia is one of five states that uses contributory negligence instead of comparative negligence. The majority of states use the doctrine of comparative negligence which means, when both the victim and the defendant contributed to an accident by failing to exercise a reasonable degree of care and caution, each party's degree of liability is apportioned. The total amount that an accident victim is awarded is lessened in direct relation to his or her own negligence. For instance, if a jury found that an accident victim was entitled to $1,000,000.00 in damages but found that the victim was 20% at fault, the jury award would be $800,000.00.

Virginia''s contributory negligence doctrine is more cut throat and can be a complete bar to an injured victim's recovery. Virginia personal injury attorneys often struggle to help clients because of this all or nothing rule. Under contributory negligence, the accident victim's failure to exercise a reasonable degree of care and caution, no matter how slight, is an absolute bar to recovery. If the defendant's lawyer can convince a jury that the victim was only 1% at fault, that individual will not recover any damages.