Considerations In Determineing Whether a Stop and Frisk Is Permissible

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

A common misconception is that law enforcement officials are entitled to stop and question citizens without any basis or reason for doing so. In reality, a set of firm legal guidelines are in place that govern whether or not an officer is permitted to stop and frisk nearby pedestrians.

For a police officer to stop someone, the officer must have a reasonable belief that a crime is either being committed or about to be committed. While this standard falls well below the probable cause an officer must have to arrest or search a suspect, an officer must be able to identify and articulate specific facts that explain their reasonable belief that the person stopped has been engaged in criminal activity. Circumstances considered in justifying an officer's reasonable belief are whether an individual is near where a crime was recently reported, whether the individual matches a suspect description, whether or not the individual attempts to flee, and whether the individual exhibits nervous or agitated behavior upon being stopped. It is important to note that while an officer may stop an individual based upon a reasonable belief, the individual being stopped is not required to respond to the officer and may only be arrested if their responses or actions create probable cause for arrest.

Similarly, an officer may frisk an individual if they have a reasonable belief, supported by articulable facts, that the individual stopped may be armed or poses a threat to the officer. Justifications commonly used to support a reasonable belief for a frisk are physical indications that a weapon is being concealed, nervous or agitated behavior, or the size and number of suspects being stopped. It is important to remember that the officer must either suspect the person is carrying a gun or feel physically threatened in order to conduct a frisk. For example, suspicion that an individual stopped is in possession of narcotics is not alone sufficient to justify a frisk, unless there is an articulable fear that the individual is armed or poses a physical threat.

The law firm of Portner & Shure has many years of experience representing criminal defendants in both Maryland and Virginia.

If you have been charged with a crime or believe that you have been charged with a crime as the result of an illegal stop or frisk, please contact our Virginia criminal defense attorneys.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://mt.portnerandshure.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/484

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jonathan Portner published on June 24, 2011 12:08 PM.

Virginia DUI or Simply Sleeping It Off? was the previous entry in this blog.

Police Deception and the Waiver of Miranda Rights is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 5.02